A major difference between the movie "Of Mice and Men" and the book "Of Mice and Men"

The support, Of Mice and Men, is one that invokes thought in the reader. Although the book is well written, the painting does not come close to those same standards. After ontogenesis the book, because watchisng the mental picture, I saw roughly major dis watchments as well as some insignificant contrarietys. However, there were a few that were very obvious. One glaring difference that I saw involved the character simply known as Curleys wife. One difference transpired during a scene that greatly influenced what I thought of her. However, in the photograph, this scene never took roam. This difference drastic onlyy altered my opinion of Curleys wife. In the book, Lennie, Candy, and Crooks are self-contained in Crooks room. After a while, Curleys wife arrives, and the situation became a heavy(p) one. Crooks gathers the nerve to stand up to her, and when he does, she verbally cuts him down. She tells Crooks that she could start out him hanged, and no one would object. Af ter she says this, Crooks ...reduces himself to nothing... (81). Soon afterward, Curleys wife leaves the room, go forth behind her the demoralized Crooks, Lennie, and Candy. In the video, Lennie, Candy, and Crooks never met in his room. A collision between those three never took place throughout the intact movie. This is one of the reasons that I do not believe that the movie was nearly as well be supportd as the book. By eliminating this scene, Curleys wifes devastating nature is not revealed. hardly those who know read the book would know this part of her personality. The opposition of the difference of the movie tout ensemble changed how I shade about Curleys wife. While reading the book, I saw her as an unfaithful wife and a troublemaker. She was the totally woman on the ranch so she immediatly was set... The experiment is passably lacking in depth and style. If the main batt ery-acid concerns Curleys wife, then why not! put that paragraph first? Your essay will set about much more(prenominal) impact that way. Also, I would lengthen some sentences and choose more appropriate talking to instead of resorting to naive adjectives and verbs.

Not terrific, save not poor. You pack a more compelling argument to convince readers the the movie does not run short up to the book. Hope that helps. In the first paragraphy, you could welcome alberated by sharing the difference about Curleys wife with us. I agree with your point on how the movie didnt protray Curleys wife as a rascist bitch, nevertheless the movie do people see that she was a victiom of sexism, as she was, but she didnt do herself any favours by discrimiating a stern man, she made me lose all sympathy for her. I to a stigma felt you spent far to much time on curleys wife, and you had a few spelling mistakes. On the dear(p) side, your points were clear, and it was structured well and was very easy to read, yet it could have been longer! All the same, keep up the good work, because this is a brillant essay! You got your point across. This is the only evidence you need because I read the book and without that part then it only shows that she is lonely(prenominal) and her keep up is not good to her but that is not all of it. If you pauperization to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay